Sound Familiar? • VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

Sound Familiar?

published by Fedquip

1 year 2 weeks ago • 1381 views

tags: fox news, iran, iraq, war mongers

You should also watch
“Tom Lantos agrees with Alan Greenspan: Iraq War was for Oil”

http://foxattacks.com/iran

Comments

amazing

written by Grimm

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

My God, I hate those people.

written by rougy

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Brings a whole new context to "We Report. You Decide."

How valid is a decision if it's based on their flawed reporting. This would be a good time to go reread 1984.

written by T-man

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

$100 to the first person to post a clip from ANY American news network that has stated that Iran poses no threat. Fox is just the fat end of the wedge.

written by Irishman

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The whole point of the campaign is to beg other networks not to follow the Fox on this.

From the link - http://foxattacks.com/iran
"Dear ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN,

"My station was intimidated by the administration and its foot soldiers at FOX News."

That is CNN's Christiane Amanpour explaining why the major television networks failed to accurately inform the public in the lead-up to the Iraq war, choosing instead to follow FOX's lead.

Now, FOX is beating the drums for war with Iran. Robert Greenwald's short film, "FOX Attacks: Iran", outlines the evidence from the station's own broadcasts, comparing their reporting before the Iraq war with what they are saying now about Iran.

You have a sacred responsibility to the American people to provide accurate and reliable information so we can best make the decisions which affect our lives. We urge you to accurately and thoroughly report all sides of this important story.

Please do not blindly follow FOX down the road to another war."

written by Fedquip

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The New World Order Corporate War Machine in action. To bring the American way of rampant consumerism in a monopolized global market. Partially supported by fanatical fundamentalism in the Christian sense. The ideal foot soldiers. Easily brainwashed to follow the lead when spoon fed lies that they are working in the name of their so-called fairytale God and working to convert the rest of the pagan world, with hopes to 'save' people. Its surely not as simple as that, but it is a good part of the insanity.

written by honkeytonk73

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

In the style of choggie:

Iran bean deserve a good arse-kickn for over 50 years, long before teh FOX news ever been lived. Total denial from FOX-haters and -baiters who worship their Play-Doh made demon-nemsis while ignorin genocidal dickhead helming Iran, whose already threatened to annihilate Jewish Israel.

When USA and common sense is yer #1 enemys, not terrorists, you vote democrats or darth nader. FILE NOT FOUND.

written by quantumushroom

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I'm a believer, but the editing on this is unfortunately worthy of the Fox News Channel.

written by broseth | 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Saudi Arabia funds Sunni resistance against US military presence, but they are allies not enemies. So that's okay.

written by Farhad2000

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

why do you think we are arming Iraqis? Why do you think billions of $USD have gone missing along with weapons? It will be all out Iran/Iraq III with Sunni/Shia free for all, and the Saudis are backing their chosen peoples.

written by joedirt

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

the true problem there then is the atomic weapon are in this case real. Is totally foolhardy to attack iran because is mean we will automatically enter a nuclear war. And nuclear war=armageddon.

written by chicar | 1 year 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

WTF?! So you already believe there is a nuke? Sorry, read anything credible on Iran, they don't have the means to refine to weapons grade, and they wont for some time. They don't even have reactor grade, which is what they want in the first place.

There would be a nuclear war in this case, but it would be US and Israel flying around dropping mini-nukes on mountains. The fallout would poison Afghan, pakistan, india. It would be the world's biggest folly.

written by joedirt

| 1 year 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

True, Iran poses no threat to anyone. I mean, they've always been a well disciplined, peaceful country, historically speaking.

written by BillOreilly

| 1 year 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

more peaceful than us, by a long frickin shot.

written by Enzoblue | 1 year 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Iran is a corrupt, economically inefficent country 80% of it's income is dervied from oil export. The only reason the administration wants war over there is because it would justifiy the cluster fuck that is Iraq by blaming it on anti-american forces in Iran, covering thier asses again for the period until they can hand off the White house to someone else.

written by Farhad2000

| 1 year 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)